Our Environmental Protection Initiatives and Climate Change Response

In line with its management philosophy, “Peace of mind, forever,” Meiji Yasuda considers the preservation of the Earth on which people can live with peace of mind to be a universal and crucial issue for humanity. Accordingly, we have positioned “Protect the environment and combat climate change” as a priority issue that must be addressed in order to create social value from standpoints of both a business operator and an institutional investor and contribute to the creation of a sustainable society.

Group Environmental Policy(PDF 153KB)PDFファイル

Our response to recommendations from the TCFD and TNFD*1

Today, global warming, climate change and the loss of natural capital*2 and biodiversity have begun affecting our economic and social activities. These problems call for urgent response in countries around the world. This is why Meiji Yasuda has positioned “Protect the environment and combat climate change” as a priority issue.
Meiji Yasuda is striving to ensure that every aspect of its business operations harmonizes with the global environment in line with its Group Environmental Policy, which defines its stance to environmental protection initiatives. From the standpoints of both a business operator and an institutional investor, efforts are now under way to step up our relevant initiatives.

In addition, we consider appropriate information disclosure pursuant to international standards to be an integral part of these initiatives. Accordingly, in January 2019 we declared our support for recommendations from the TCFD (dissolved in November 2023 and taken over by the IFRS). In June 2023, we also participated in the TNFD forum and, in November of the same year, we were registered as a “TNFD Adopter” who declared its commitment to undertaking information disclosure in accordance with the TNFD recommendations. Thus, we have been striving to enhance the content of information disclosure in line with these two frameworks.

*1 The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, the Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
*2 Capital consisting of forest, soil, water, air, biological resources and other natural resources

Governance

We have also appointed an operating officer in charge of sustainability management & development, with the aim of strengthening environmental protection, climate change response and other initiatives to contribute to the creation of a sustainable society. At the same time, a general manager position was created and charged with sustainability management & development. Also, the Sustainability Deliberation Committee was formulated as an advisory body to the Management Council. Chaired by the operating officer in charge of sustainability management & development, the Sustainability Deliberation Committee is tasked with discussing climate change-related strategies, risk management, metrics, targets and transition plans as well as policies for sustainability management initiatives while monitoring and reporting the progress of such initiatives to the Management Council and the Board of Directors.

In asset management, we established a general manager position for supervising the Responsible Investment Development, with the aim of strengthening our relevant structure under which we promote responsible investment based on our fundamental concept for investment and financing intended to help resolve environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and create a sustainable society.

Risk Management

Meiji Yasuda has defined risks arising from climate change as a “key risk” to be addressed via its framework for enterprise risk management, and we are striving to strengthen our structure for monitoring such risks on both a qualitative and quantitative basis.

Specifically, the Risk Management Control Department is acting in collaboration with relevant departments to identify and assess risks and opportunities arising from climate change, monitor regulatory trends at home and abroad and the status of initiatives undertaken by Meiji Yasuda, and evaluate and verify progress in these initiatives. Findings from the above endeavors are periodically reported to the Management Council and the Risk Management Domain Committee, so that signs of risks are properly detected and addressed.

Strategy

Climate change- and nature-related risks and opportunities

We recognize climate change- and nature-related risks and opportunities as presented in the following chart (items marked with “・”). Moreover, we have conducted scenario analysis associated with climate change-related risks and opportunities from the standpoints of both a business operator and an institutional investor, with results of such analysis featured on the next page.

In addition, the status of natural capital and biodiversity is closely connected to climate change. Accordingly, the TNFD recommends the integrated disclosure of both climate change- and nature-related information. In line with this recommendation, we have organized climate change- and nature-related risks and opportunities in a manner that integrates both.

A table that classifies climate change- and nature-related risks and opportunities into physical risks, transition risks and opportunities, and lists the primary impacts of each item on business activities, timespan and magnitude.

Climate change-related scenario analysis: TCFD

We conduct scenario analysis to understand the detailed status of climate change-related risks. As a business operator, our scenario analysis focuses on determining the impact of these risks on the amount of death insurance claims and hospitalization benefits to be paid. As an institutional investor, our analysis is aimed at assessing to what extent our investment and financing portfolio will be impacted by these risks.

Scenario analysis refers to the analysis of the impact of climate change on future corporate activities via the use of multiple differing scenarios for climate change.

●Impact on the amount of death insurance claims and hospitalization benefits to be paid

As a business operator, we have analyzed expected growth in the amount of death insurance claims and hospitalization benefits due to global rises in temperatures in light of the relatively high likelihood of this phenomenon compared with other repercussions of climate change.

Based on growing mortality risks arising from higher temperature and severe heat, results of this analysis suggested that a 2°C rise in average temperature will lead to an increase of approximately 1.5 billion yen in the payment of death insurance claims, while a rise of 4°C will lead to an increase of around 5.8 billion yen in the payment of these claims. As for the amount of hospitalization benefits, our analysis forecasts that the payment of hospitalization benefits will grow by about 20 million yen and 70 million yen, respectively, due to a rise of 2°C and 4°C in average temperature, as a growing number of policyholders are expected to be hospitalized to treat heat stroke and other symptoms caused by higher temperatures. It was also confirmed that the financial impact of these rises is limited, considering Meiji Yasuda’s past track record in the payment of these claims and benefits.

However, when it comes to the analysis of the impact of higher temperatures on the amount of death insurance claims and hospitalization benefits, there are no globally agreed-upon methods for carrying out such analysis at present, with various methods now in the process of development. Therefore, we will strive to remain apprised of international trends and maintain collaboration with research institutions and specialist organizations at home and abroad, with the aim of promoting further surveys and analysis.

●Impact on our investment and financing portfolio

As an institutional investor, we have introduced Climate Value-at Risk (“CVaR”), a tool developed by MSCI, to conduct the quantitative assessment of the impact of climate change on our investment and financing portfolio of domestic and foreign stocks as well as both domestic and foreign bonds.

Leveraging this tool, we calculated and analyzed climate change’s potential financial impact on our investees. As a result, the 1.5°C scenario, which pertains to the rise in air temperature from the pre-industrial revolution level, forecasts the materialization of significant transition risks. Under the 3.0°C scenario, the frequency of abnormal weather is expected to grow, with physical risks becoming more profound. However, the estimated impact is considered to be absorbable within the scope of real net assets (see Diagram 1 below).

We have also conducted a sector-based analysis of the impact of climate change on our investment and financing portfolio, targeting investee corporations in Japan. As a result, it was suggested that the impact on the energy, transportation equipment and other sectors that consume massive volumes of fossil fuels will be profound (see Diagram 2 below). We are utilizing results of this and similar analyses to inform our efforts to engage in constructive dialogue with investees.

Methods for analyzing climate change’s impact on the investment and financing portfolio are still in the development phase. Looking ahead, we will continuously update our methods for surveys and analysis.

Two graphs showing the impact of climate change scenarios on the investment and financing portfolio. By scenario, transition risk is significant under the 1.5°C scenario, while physical risk is significant under the 3.0°C scenario. By industry, impacts are significant in industries that consume large amounts of fossil fuels, such as energy and transportation equipment.
A table summarizing NGFS climate change scenarios by temperature increase of 1.5°C, 2.0°C and 3.0°C. It outlines the Low Demand, Net Zero 2050, Below 2°C, Delayed Transition, Nationally Determined Contributions and Fragmented World scenarios.

The analysis of nature-related dependency and impact: TNFD

We have also analyzed nature-related risks associated with our investment and financing portfolio. In doing so, we utilized “ENCORE”* to conduct a sector-based assessment and evaluate the degree of our portfolio’s dependence on benefits arising from natural capital as well as the degree of its impact on changes in the status of such capital.

Results of this analysis suggested that “Food” and “Steel and nonferrous” are primary sectors with a relatively large degree of dependency and impact. At the same time, this analysis identified sectors in which Meiji Yasuda has relatively large holdings: “Trading and wholesale,” “Electrics and precision devices,” “Power and gas,” “Raw materials and chemicals,” “Automotive and transportation aircraft,” “Transportation and logistics.” Currently, we are analyzing the degree of dependency and impact relative to these eight primary sectors based on important natural capital that has been identified for each. Drawing on analysis results, Meiji Yasuda will promote dialogue with investees to encourage them to upgrade their initiatives to protect natural capital and biodiversity as well as their mode of information disclosure.

A chart showing the relationship between dependence on and impact on natural capital by sector. The vertical axis indicates dependence on natural capital, while the horizontal axis indicates impact on natural capital. The chart shows the relative positions of sectors in which Meiji Yasuda holds relatively large asset balances. Food and steel and nonferrous  have high levels of both dependence and impact, while trading and wholesale, electrics and precision devices,  power and gas are shown as sectors with large holdings.
A heat map showing the dependency and impact of eight primary sectors on natural capital by factor, using color gradations from small to large. It indicates the degree of dependency on natural capital, such as freshwater supply, water purification, and maintenance of soil and sand, as well as the degree of impact on natural capital, such as water consumption volume, land usage, GHG emissions, and waste. Food, steel and nonferrous, power and gas have many items with large dependency or impact.

The TNFD requires the assessment of dependency and impact on natural capital throughout the entire value chain (upstream and downstream) of businesses. With this in mind, we have selected the four particularly important sectors from among the eight sectors identified in the preceding page to study and analyze relationships between their upstream and downstream value chain constituents. Meiji Yasuda is thus taking a more precise approach to engagement with investee corporations by conducting dialogue based on the assessment of nature-related risks confronting these investees as well as their value chains.

Value chain analysis diagrams for four priority sectors. Focusing on food, electric power and gas, trading companies and wholesalers, and steel and non-ferrous metals, the diagrams organize transaction relationships and dependencies with upstream and downstream related industries, as well as the magnitude of impacts and risks related to natural capital.

Transition plan

To contribute to the realization of a carbon-free society, we set and announced a target of net-zero CO2 emissions to be achieved in FY2050 and an intermediate target to be achieved in FY2030 from the standpoint of both a business operator and an institutional investor.

A roadmap to net-zero CO2 emissions. As a business operator, Meiji Yasuda has set targets to reduce Scope 1 & 2 emissions by 50% in FY2024-FY2026 and by 67% in FY2030, and to achieve a 100% switchover to renewable energy for electricity used by FY2040. It also aims to reduce Scope 3 emissions (Categories 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) by 40% in FY2030, and, as an institutional investor, to reduce Scope 3 emissions (Category 15) by 50% in FY2030, with the aim of achieving net-zero CO2 emissions in FY2050.

Approximately 80% of CO2 emissions currently related to Scope 1 & 2 arise from electricity used in our business activities. Given these factors, as a business operator, we strive for a phased switchover to renewable energy for the electricity used in our real estate holdings, including three buildings with major Head Office functions, and other properties now in the process of rebuilding.
We are also promoting energy conservation within our company, including the use of LEDs for lighting fixtures and more efficient air conditioning equipment for our real estate holdings.
Furthermore, we are switching our sales sites nationwide to ZEB Ready-compliant buildings at the timing of renovations such as long-term repair while proactively introducing leased vehicles that are eco-friendly.
Aiming to achieve our intermediate reduction target of -67%, which was set for FY2030 relative to our Scope 1 & 2 emissions, we will accelerate the introduction of renewable energy at our real estate properties and otherwise step up our endeavors to reduce the volume of CO2 emissions.

As an institutional investor, we strive to transition to a portfolio capable of contributing to the realization of a carbon-free society. To this end, we invest in Green Bonds alongside investment and financing to support renewable energy power generation businesses. At the same time, we are proactively engaged in transition finance. After studying the transition plans of our investees and other companies, whose operations entail a high volume of CO2 emissions, we are engaging with them as well. By doing so, we practice milestone management regarding the status of initiatives undertaken by these companies to reduce their CO2 emissions. Our engagement activities not only consist of those undertaken by Meiji Yasuda alone but also include joint engagement involving other investors. We also ask our external asset managers to conduct engagement activities and promote initiatives that support decarbonization.

Metrics and Targets

From the standpoints of both a business operator and an institutional investor, we monitor the volume of our CO2 emissions and the status of progress in our initiatives. (All targets indicate reduction from the level recorded in FY2013.)

  • Reduction targets for the volume of CO2 emissions as a business operator
    (Scope 1 & 2: Meiji Yasuda Group; Scope 3: Meiji Yasuda, non-consolidated basis)

*6

Results for FY2025

Targets for FY2030

Targets for FY2050

Scope 1 & 2*1

-63%

-67%

-100% (Net zero emissions)

Scope 3*2

-36%

-40%

  • Reduction targets for the volume of CO2 emissions from portfolio as an institutional investor*3
    (Meiji Yasuda, non-consolidated basis)

*6

Results for FY2024

Targets for FY2030

Targets for FY2050

Scope 1 & 2*4,5

-51%

-50%

-100% (Net zero emissions)

  • The ratio of renewable energy used
  • Target: Achieve 100% switchover to renewable energy in terms of electricity used at our domestic business bases by the end of FY2040 (FY2025 results: 44%)

*1 Scope 1 consists of direct emissions from the Company’s activities, such as the use of fuel. Scope 2 consists of indirect emissions attributable to such factors as sources of purchased energy. The scope of calculation comprises Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance Company and its domestic consolidated subsidiaries (Meiji Yasuda General Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Trust Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Asset Management Company Ltd. and Meiji Yasuda System Technology Company Limited), as well as its consolidated overseas subsidiaries, namely, Meiji Yasuda America Incorporated, StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, Limited.

*2 Scope 3 consists of indirect emissions attributable to supply chains outside the Company. The above targets for Scope 3 are calculated based only on six categories (1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) in light of their importance. As an institutional investor, the Company manages emissions in category 15 (Investments) separately as emissions from investees.

*3 In April 2025, the Company switched its method for measuring the volume of CO2 emissions from its investment and financing portfolio. The new method is based on the PCAF standard, which provides criteria for measurement methods to be undertaken by financial institutions to assess the volume of CO2 emissions from their investees. Accordingly, the past results presented above, including those for the benchmark year (FY2013), have been retrospectively restated.

*4 Representing reduction targets for Scope 1 & 2 emissions from domestic listed companies we invest in via stock, corporate bonds and other financing.

*5 The volume of emissions in FY2024 as an institutional investor is calculated based on data available as of April 22, 2026.

*6 Results of and reduction plans for the volume of CO2 emissions as a business operator and an institutional investor may be amended due to changes in calculation standards, the scope of calculation, information disclosed by investees and their plans.

Environmental Data

CO2 Emissions from Meiji Yasuda*1

Scope 1&2(t-CO2)

Items

FY2013

FY2021

FY2022

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025
(Comparison with FY2013)

Scope1

Direct emission from using fuel, etc.

9,208

6,450

6,583

5,735

6,703

5,808

Scope2

Indirect emissions from purchased energy

128,756

89,086

82,056

60,617

51,905

46,334

Scope 1&2

137,964

95,536

88,639

66,352

58,608

52,142
(-63%)

Scope 3

Items

FY2013

FY2021

FY2022

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025
(Comparison with FY2013)

Scope3

Indirect emissions attributable to supply chains outside the Company

56,409

45,684

44,389

41,077

41,373

35,964
(-36%)

 

Category 1

Purchased goods and services

24,213

17,672

17,327

14,585

16,222

13,557

Category 3

Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)

15,308

13,050

12,727

11,898

11,081

8,840

 

Category 4

Upstream transportation and distribution

9,350

11,268

10,163

9,271

8,622

7,855

Category 5

Waste generated in operations

256

301

413

934

1,094

939

Category 6

Business travel

3,512

1,065

1,553

1,937

1,991

2,295

Category 7

Employee commuting

3,217

2,328

2,206

2,452

2,362

2,478

Category 8

Upstream leased assets

553

-

-

-

-

-

*1We calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions using the “emission factors by energy source” and the “adjusted emission factors by electricity supplier” published pursuant to the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures.*

* Indirect emissions from purchased electricity consumption are calculated using the “basic emission factor” through FY2020 and the “adjusted emission factor” from FY2021 onward.

・Emissions from fuel consumption by company vehicles, which are included in Scope 1, are calculated based on total actual mileage and average fuel efficiency.

・Scope 2 emissions are calculated based on purchased electricity and steam consumption subject to the Act on the Rational Use of Energy. For energy consumed by tenants in our own buildings, we also include consumption by tenants for which we have energy management authority under the Act.

For Scope 3 emissions, we use the “Emissions Unit Values Database for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Organizations through the Supply Chain” (hereinafter referred to as the “Database”).

・Category 1: The activity items subject to calculation include copying paper, brochures, and other materials purchased by Meiji Yasuda. The emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity amount, namely printing material costs, by the emission intensities for “Western paper / Japanese paper” and “printing / plate making / bookbinding” in the Database.

・Category 3: The activity item subject to calculation is fuel used to generate the electricity consumed in our business operations. The emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity amount, namely the amount of electricity consumed, by the emission intensity for “electricity” at the fuel procurement stage in the Database.

・Category 4: The activity item subject to calculation is in-house delivery. The emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity amount, namely delivery costs, by the emission intensity for “self-transportation (freight vehicles)” in the Database.

・Category 5: The activity item subject to calculation is waste generated from our business operations. The emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity amount, namely the amount of industrial waste discharged, by the emission intensity for “waste type” in the Database. Disposal of PCB waste is not included in Category 5 activities.

・Category 6: The activity item subject to calculation is business travel by our employees. The emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity amount, namely business travel expenses, by the emission intensity for “mode of transportation” in the Database.

・Category 7: The activity item subject to calculation is commuting by our employees. The emissions are calculated by multiplying the activity amount, namely commuting expenses, by the emission intensity for “passenger rail” in the Database.

・Category 8: Emissions from upstream leased assets have been included in Scope 1 since FY2021 due to changes in the aggregation method.

・Category 15: Emissions are disclosed separately as “Emissions from Investments and Financing.”

CO2 emissions figures may vary due to changes in calculation methods or reporting scope.

CO2 Emissions from Meiji Yasuda Group*2

Scope 1&2(t-CO2)

Items

FY2022

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025

Scope1

Direct emissions from using fuel, etc.

8,091

7,060

7,905

6,965

Scope2

Indirect emissions from purchased energy

84,391

61,295

52,704

47,031

Scope 1&2

92,482

68,355

60,609

53,995

*2Boundary: Meiji Yasuda and domestic consolidated subsidiaries such as Meiji Yasuda General Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Trust Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Meiji Yasuda System & Technology Co., Ltd., as well as overseas consolidated subsidiaries including Meiji Yasuda America Inc., StanCorp Financial Group, Inc., and Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, Limited. Measurement began in FY2023 for Meiji Yasuda America Inc. and Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, Limited, and in FY2025 for Meiji Yasuda Trust Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
We use the “emission factors by energy” and “adjusted emission factors by power supplier” published based on the “Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures” to calculate Scope 1 and 2 emissions.

・Emissions from the use of commercial vehicle fuel included in Scope 1 are calculated from the total of actual mileage and average fuel consumption.

・Scope2 is calculated based on purchased electricity and steam consumption, which are subject to the “Act on the Rationalizing Energy Use”. For tenant use of energy in our own buildings, we also include the use of tenants which we have energy management authority under the act.

CO2 emissions figures may vary due to changes in calculation methods or reporting scope.

Scope 3*3

Items

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025

Scope3

Indirect emissions attributable to supply chains outside the Company

45,007

45,371

39,736

 

Category 1

Purchased goods and services

17,811

19,527

16,509

Category 3

Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)

11,996

11,171

8,923

 

Category 4

Upstream transportation and distribution

9,271

8,627

7,859

Category 5

Waste generated in operations

945

1,104

946

Category 6

Business travel

1,989

2,044

2,380

Category 7

Employee commuting

2,995

2,898

3,120

*3Boundary: Meiji Yasuda and domestic consolidated subsidiaries as Meiji Yasuda General Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Trust Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Asset Management Company Ltd., and Meiji Yasuda System Technology Company Limited

・Category 1; Activity items subject to calculation are copying paper, brochure etc., which Meiji Yasuda Group has purchased. The activity amount (printed material cost) multiplied by the emission intensity of “Western paper / Japanese paper” and “Printing / plate making / bookbinding” in the Database.

・Category 3; Activity item subject to calculation is the fuel to produce electricity used in our business. The activity amount (amount of electricity used) multiplied by the emission intensity of “electricity” in the Database at the time of fuel procurement.

・Category 4; Activity item subject to calculation is in-house delivery. The activity amount (delivery cost) multiplied by the emission intensity of “self-transportation (freight vehicle)” in the Database.

・Category 5; Activity item subject to calculation is waste generated from our business. The activity amount (amount of industrial waste discharged) multiplied by the emission intensity of “waste type” in the Database. PCB waste disposal is not included in category 5 activities.

・Category 6; Activity item subject to calculation is our employee’s business travel. The activity amount (business trip expense) multiplied by the emission intensity of “transportation method” in the Database.

・Category 7; Activity item subject to calculation is our employee’s commute. The activity amount (commuting expense) multiplied by the emission intensity of “passenger train” in the Database.

CO2 emissions figures may vary due to changes in calculation methods or reporting scope.

Environmental performance data by Meiji Yasuda*4

Items

FY2021

FY2022

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025

City gas(thousand m3)

-

1,723

1,493

1,683

1,521

A-type heavy oil(kl)

-

1

1

2

59

LP gas (t)

-

19

20

28

33

Kerosene(kl)

-

71

51

80

34

Gasoline(kl)

-

1,135

1,090

1,282

1,017

Electricity consumption(MWh)

191,422

186,688

179,315

179,223

171,308

 

Renewable energy consumption(MWh)

1,417

10,040

51,964

71,081

76,557

Steam(GJ)

-

25,587

26,196

26,975

24,440

Hot water(GJ)

-

6,807

6,713

7,626

6,382

Cold water(GJ)

-

33,915

33,991

35,704

25,906

Water consumption(thousand m3)

844

877

845

849

855

Waste generated(t)

658

1,448

2,002

2,211

1,758

Paper consumption(t)

1,330

1,280

1,223

1,180

1,158

Paper recycling volume(t)

-

1,670

1,948

1,886

1,687

*4Definitions and calculation methods for environmental performance data are as below

・Data on city gas, A-type heavy oil, LP gas, kerosene, gasoline, steam, hot water, cold water, and paper recycling volume has been disclosed starting from the fiscal year 2022.

・Usage amounts of city gas, A-type heavy oil, LP gas, kerosene, electricity, steam, hot water, and cold water are calculated based on the “Act on the Rational Use of Energy” (Energy Conservation Act).

・Gasoline consumption is calculated using the actual driving distance of company vehicles and their average fuel efficiency.

・Renewable energy includes purchased electricity derived from non-fossil fuels and electricity generated by solar power installed on our premises.

・Water consumption is calculated based of the bill from the Water Bureau.

・Waste generated is the amount of waste, as defined in the “Waste Management and Public Cleansing Act”, from business establishments, calculated by aggregating the figures stated in manifests issued based on the Act. PCB waste disposal is not included.

・Paper consumption is calculated by aggregating office paper subject to report in accordance with the “Environmental Reporting Guidelines” from office supplies purchase system data.

・Paper recycling volume includes confidential document recycling.

Environmental performance data by Meiji Yasuda Group*5

Items

FY2022

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025

Electricity consumption(MWh)

186,689

180,747

180,568

172,635

 

Renewable energy consumption(MWh)

10,040

51,964

71,111

76,672

Water consumption(thousand m3)

888

855

858

867

Waste generated(t)

1,470

2,039

2,243

1,790

Paper consumption(t)

1,295

1,239

1,196

1,171

*5Definitions and calculation methods for environmental performance data are as below

・Boundary: Meiji Yasuda and domestic consolidated subsidiaries as Meiji Yasuda General Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Trust Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Meiji Yasuda Asset Management Company Ltd., and Meiji Yasuda System Technology Company Limited. Measurement began in FY2025 for Meiji Yasuda Trust Life Insurance Co., Ltd.

・Based on the “Act on the Rationalizing Energy Use”, purchased electricity is calculated based on the bill from suppliers, and soler power consumption is calculated from solar system data.

・Renewable energy includes purchased electricity derived from non-fossil fuels and electricity generated by solar power installed on our premises.

・Water consumption is calculated based of the bill from the Water Bureau.

・Waste generated is the amount of waste, as defined in the “Waste Management and Public Cleansing Act”, from business establishments, calculated by aggregating the figures stated in manifests issued based on the Act. PCB waste disposal is not included.

・Paper consumption is calculated by aggregating office paper subject to report in accordance with the “Environmental Reporting Guidelines” from office supplies purchase system data.

CO2 Emissions from portfolio as an Institutional Investor*4

Scope1・2(kt-CO2)

Item

FY2013

FY2020

FY2021

FY2022

FY2023

FY2024
(Comparison with FY2013)

Scope 1&2*5

25,195

16,671

15,983

13,624

12,753

12,148
(-51%)

*4In cases such as mergers or acquisitions of investees that are deemed to have a relatively large impact on our portfolio, we may recalculate the baseline values.
In April 2025, we changed the method for measuring the CO2 emissions of our portfolio to the PCAF standard, and we are restating past performance figures, including the baseline year (FY2013).
*5Covers stocks, corporate bonds, and loans of domestic listed companies
CO2 Emissions Data Collection Date: April 22, 2026

Detailed Data on CO2 Emissions from investees(PDF 242KB)PDFファイル

Third-Party Assurance

In order to ensure the credibility of our reported data, environmental metrics are assured by an independent third-party organization, as detailed below.

Independent Third-Party Assurance Report(PDF 2.29MB)PDFファイル

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

PDFDownload the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view pages from the link marked with

Click here to download Adobe Acrobat Reader